Pedagogical Conditions for Developing Core Competencies in School Students Through the Integration of Physics and Technical Knowledge

Davletova Selbi Atadjanovna

doi:10.61227/jtlc.v1i2.218

Authors

Davletova Selbi Atadjanovna Basic doctoral student of the Ajiniyaz NSPI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61227/jtlc.v1i2.218

Keywords:

Competence, integration, approach, consistency, communication, synthesis, program, action, development

Abstract

This study examines the pedagogical conditions necessary for developing core competencies in school students through the integration of physics and technical knowledge within a STEM education framework. Through a quasi-experimental design involving 120 secondary school students (experimental group n=60, control group n=60), the research investigated the effectiveness of integrated physics-technology instruction over one academic semester. Pre-test and post-test assessments measured students' competency development in problem-solving, critical thinking, and practical application skills. Results demonstrated that the experimental group showed significantly higher competency gains (M=78.4, SD=6.2) compared to the control group (M=64.7, SD=7.1), t(118)=10.83, p<0.001, d=2.08. Five essential pedagogical conditions were identified through mixed-methods analysis: interdisciplinary curriculum design, laboratory infrastructure adequacy, teacher professional development in integrative approaches, project-based learning methodologies, and motivation-enhancing learning environments. Qualitative data from student interviews and classroom observations revealed increased engagement and deeper conceptual understanding in the integrated approach. The findings suggest that successful competency development requires systematic integration of these pedagogical conditions within institutional frameworks. This research contributes to the growing literature on STEM education and provides practical implications for curriculum designers and educators implementing integrated science-technology programs.

References

Al-Kamzari, A., & Alias, N. (2025). Developing collaborative and critical thinking competencies through project-based learning in physics education. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09876-x

Asrizal, A., Zan, A. M., Mardian, V., & Festiyed, F. (2022). The impact of static fluid e-module by integrating STEM on learning outcomes of students. Journal of Education Technology, 6(1), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v6i1.42458

Bhakti, Y. B., Astuti, I. A. D., Okyranida, I. Y., Asih, D. A. S., Marhento, G., & Leonard, L. (2020). Integrated STEM project based learning implementation to improve student science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(4), 042035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042035

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139

Borytko, N. M., Dynina, S. A., & Kupriyanov, B. V. (2006). Pedagogical conditions in educational theory. Moscow: Academy Publishing.

Brassler, M., & Dettmers, J. (2017). How to enhance interdisciplinary competence: Interdisciplinary problem-based learning versus interdisciplinary project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1686

Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x

Bunyamin, M. A. H., Aspin, S. H., & Ali, M. (2020). Physics has a strong connection to the integrated STEM elements. Learning Science and Mathematics, 15, 125-139.

Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd ed.). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6

Casey, K., & Sturgis, C. (2014). Levers and logic models: A framework to guide research and design of high-quality competency-based education systems. Vienna, VA: International Association for K-12 Online Learning.

Competency-Based Education Network (C-BEN). (2022). Quality principles for competency-based education programs. Retrieved from https://www.c-ben.org/

Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students' understanding of electromagnetism concepts? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243-279. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_3

English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1

English, L. D., & King, D. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students' investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7

Ernazarov, A., & Abduqodirov, A. (2022). Improving student engagement through interdisciplinary teaching in physics. Central Asian Journal of Education, 7(2), 89-104.

Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Guo, J., Yang, L., & Shi, Q. (2017). Effects of project-based learning on physics problem-solving skills and conceptual understanding. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020141. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020141

Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education: Theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 51(2), 287-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6386-5

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Holubova, R. (2008). Effective teaching methods: Project-based learning in physics. US-China Education Review, 5(12), 27-36.

Hurley, M. M. (2001). Reviewing integrated science and mathematics: The search for evidence and definitions from new perspectives. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18028.x

Jho, H., Hong, O., & Song, J. (2016). An analysis of STEM/STEAM teacher education in Korea with a case study of two schools from a community of practice perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1843-1862. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1538a

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Kimori, N. (2017). Interdisciplinary learning through environmental science in physics education. International Journal of Environmental Science Education, 12(8), 1823-1835.

Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., ... & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2

Malinić, D., Mandić, D., & Radivojević, D. (2021). Interdisciplinarity within project-based learning: Enhancing metacognition in science education. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 653-668. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.653

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers' perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2

Mayes, R., Peterson, F., & Bonilla, R. (2018). Real STEM teaching strategies for secondary science teachers: Confronting student misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 85(4), 36-41.

McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource letter: PER-1: Physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 67(9), 755-767. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19122

Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In S. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices (pp. 35-60). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq7bh.7

Mustafa, N., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., & Said, M. N. H. M. (2016). A meta-analysis on effective strategies for integrated STEM education. Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4225-4228. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.8111

National Academy of Engineering (NAE) & National Research Council (NRC). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612

National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165

Nazifah, N., & Asrizal, A. (2022). Development of STEM integrated physics E-modules to improve 21st century skills of students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 1783-1789. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1820

Nguyen, T. T. T., Nguyen, V. B., & Duong, X. Q. (2020). Fostering teachers' competence of the integrated STEM education. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(2), 166-179. http://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i2.6441

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Preininger, F. (2017). Assessing the effects of project-based learning on student motivation in physics. European Journal of Physics Education, 8(2), 1-12.

Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x

Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.

Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential Readings in Problem-Based Learning, 9, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002

Shen, Y., Liu, Y., & Sung, C. H. (2014). Challenges in assessing interdisciplinary STEM education. In ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--23127

Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924

Squire, L. R., Berg, D., Bloom, F. E., du Lac, S., Ghosh, A., & Spitzer, N. C. (2013). Fundamental neuroscience (4th ed.). London: Academic Press.

Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1046

Tanenbaum, C. (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., ... & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), Article 02. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.

Uden, L., Sulaiman, S., Ching, L. S., & Rosales, E. (2023). Integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics project-based learning for physics learning from neuroscience perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1136246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136246

Vallera, F., & Bodzin, A. M. (2019). Investigating the impacts of project-based learning on conceptual knowledge and scientific reasoning in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(6), 668-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09793-y

Vieyra, R., & Himmelsbach, V. (2022). Challenges in interdisciplinary physics teaching: Teacher perspectives. Physics Education, 57(3), 035012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac5833

You, H. S. (2017). Why teach science with an interdisciplinary approach: History, trends, and conceptual frameworks. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 66-77. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p66

Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). Project-based learning in higher education: Impact on collaborative skills and critical thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09742-x