Understanding Language as a Key to Enhancing Intercultural Competence: Insights from Cultural Psychology

Vahid Ghorbani

doi:10.61227/iltt.v1i1.176

Authors

Vahid Ghorbani Instructor at Arak University, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61227/iltt.v1i1.176

Keywords:

language proficiency, cultural identity, language barriers, intercultural communication competence, cultural psychology

Abstract

Background: In today's interconnected world, intercultural communication has become essential across educational, business, and social contexts. While language proficiency is often viewed as the foundation of successful cross-cultural communication, empirical studies frequently focus on language skills in isolation, underemphasizing emotional and cultural factors, particularly in non-Western contexts. Objective: This study examined the relationships between language proficiency, cultural identity, and language barriers in shaping intercultural communication competence. Methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional survey design was employed using four standardized instruments: Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q), Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM), Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (ISS), and a researcher-developed Language Barriers Scale. Participants: 150 international students and professionals from over 15 countries (54% female, 46% male, aged 22-48) with functional second language proficiency and intercultural communication experience participated through convenience sampling via professional networking platforms. Data Collection: Data were collected over four weeks via online survey platform with anonymous responses following informed consent procedures. Data Analysis: IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 was used for descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression analyses (p < .05). Research Procedure: The study systematically progressed from participant recruitment through professional networks to online data collection using validated instruments, concluding with comprehensive statistical analysis. Results: Significant relationships emerged among all variables. Language proficiency showed strong positive correlation with intercultural communication competence (r = 0.65, p < .001), explaining 42% of variance. Cultural identity demonstrated moderately strong positive relationship with language use (r = 0.58, p < .001), accounting for 34% of variance. Language barriers exhibited strong negative correlation with communication effectiveness (r = -0.61, p < .001), explaining 37% of variance. Implications: Findings suggest effective intercultural communication requires integration of linguistic, cultural, and emotional competencies. Educational institutions should develop curricula incorporating cultural awareness and emotional intelligence alongside language instruction. Teacher training programs need to address both cognitive and affective dimensions of intercultural interaction, supporting development of intercultural training workshops and comprehensive language support services..

References

Aliakbari, M., Yasini, A., & Sadeghi, S. (2023). Iranian EFL teachers’ classroom assessment practices: Discrepancy between theory and practice. International Journal of Language Testing, 13(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijlt.2023.394374.1252

Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation, and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00082.x

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.

Chen, G.-M., & Starosta, W. J. (2000). The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale. Human Communication, 3, 1–15.

Cole, M. (2019). Alexandr Romanovich Luria: Cultural psychologist. In E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 11–28). Psychology Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dimitrov, N., & Haque, A. (2016). Intercultural teaching competence: A multi-disciplinary model for instructor reflection. Intercultural Education, 27(5), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2016.1240502

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Ghorbani, V., & Dowlatabadi, H. R. (2023a). Examining the role of language, emotion, and culture as three basic needs in intercultural communication based on Iranian language teachers’ viewpoints. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 15(32), 104–125. https://doi.org/10.22034/elt.2023.57251.2549

Ghorbani, V., & Dowlatabadi, H. R. (2023b). Pinpointing the miscellaneous causes and reasons of failure in intercultural communications from Iranian teachers’ viewpoints. JELP Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 16, 244–268. https://doi.org/10.30495/jal.2023.1995744.1519

Ghorbani, V., & Dowlatabadi, H. R. (2023c). The role of “instruction” in the development of intercultural communication among Iranian language teachers. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 11(2), 192–220. https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2023.1979330.1437

Ghorbani, V., & Dowlatabadi, H. R. (2024). Investigating the role and position of linguistic needs, affective needs, and cultural needs in intercultural communication: A mixed methods study. JSAL, 7(2), 139–161. http://jsal.ierf.ir/article-1-128-en.html

Ghorbani, V., & Dowlatabadi, H. R. (2025). An evolution in intercultural studies: Introducing intercultural communication needs model and triple needs theory in English language teaching. JSAL, 8(1), 1–27. http://jsal.ierf.ir/article-1-164-en.html

Ghorbani, V., & Kiani Fard, S. (2024). Investigating the effect of linguistic knowledge versus cultural knowledge in the formation of intercultural competence among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 34(17), 225–252.

Gudykunst, W. B. (2004). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor.

Long, J., & Lin, J. (2022). An empirical study on cultivating college students’ cross-cultural communicative competence based on the artificial-intelligence English-teaching mode. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 976310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976310

Lyu, J. (2024). Cultivating cross-cultural competence in students. SHS Web of Conferences, 187, Article 04006. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418704006

Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224

Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Fontaine, J. (2008). Mapping expressive differences around the world: The relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107311854

Mozaffarzadeh, S., & Ajideh, P. (2019). Intercultural competence: A neglected essential in the Iranian ELT textbooks. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 7(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.22049/jalda.2019.26674.1149

Roberts, R. E., Phinney, J. S., Masse, L. C., Chen, Y. R., Roberts, C. R., & Romero, A. (1999). The structure of ethnic identity of young adolescents from diverse ethnocultural groups. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431699019003001

Seregina, T., Zubanova, S., Druzhinin, V., & Shagivaleeva, G. (2019). The role of language in intercultural communication. Space and Culture, India, 7(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i3.548

Shweder, R. A., Goodnow, J. J., Hatano, G., LeVine, R. A., Markus, H. R., & Miller, P. J. (2006). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 716–792). John Wiley & Sons.

Ting-Toomey, S. (1999). Communicating across cultures. Guilford Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.