Methodological Significance of Developing Students' English Communicative Competence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61227/gjbe.v1i2.191Keywords:
English language teaching, pedagogy, methodologies, language education, second language acquisition, communicative competence, classroom strategiesAbstract
Background: The era of globalization demands the development of effective English communicative competence, but there is a gap between formal language proficiency and students' practical communication skills. Objective: This study analyzes the methodological significance in the development of students' English communicative competencies through a comprehensive investigation of various pedagogical approaches and their implementation strategies. Methods: This study used a qualitative approach with a literature review design, analyzing the scientific literature from academic databases using thematic content analysis techniques based on the Dell Hymes communicative competence theoretical framework which includes four components: grammatical, sociolinguistic, discourseal, and strategic competencies. Results: Findings show that communicative learning methodologies such as Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) are proven to be 65% more effective than conventional grammar-translation methods. Performance-based assessments through role plays, presentations, and group discussions provide a more accurate picture of students' communicative abilities. The implementation of a communicative approach requires a transformation of the learning paradigm from teacher-centered to learner-centered. Conclusion: The development of communicative competence requires a holistic and integrated approach that combines all four components of communicative competence simultaneously. Communicative methodologies have proven to be effective in bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and the use of practical language in real communication situations
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



