The Role of Teachers in Overcoming Technology Learning Loss: The Impact of Gadget Overstimulation on Elementary School Students

Authors

  • Muhammad Iqbal Al Ghozali Universitas Islam Bunga Bangsa Cirebon
  • Agus Prayitno Universitas Islam Bunga Bangsa Cirebon
  • Mila Sari Universitas Islam Bunga Bangsa Cirebon
  • Nia Nurfauziah Universitas Islam Bunga Bangsa Cirebon
  • Ratna Rokhimah Universitas Islam Bunga Bangsa Cirebon
  • Citra Dwi Asih SDN Rinjani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61227/y9vn9y31

Keywords:

Learning loss of technology, role of teachers, overstimulation of gadgets, elementary school students, pedagogical strategies

Abstract

This study examines the role of teachers in overcoming technological learning loss caused by gadget overstimulation in elementary school students. The phenomenon of excessive use of gadgets has caused various academic and behavioral problems in students, including decreased concentration, learning motivation, and academic achievement. The purpose of the study was to analyze the impact of gadget overstimulation on the learning process of elementary school students and identify the strategies applied by teachers in restoring students' learning focus. The research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with six classroom teachers (grades 1-6), one principal, three students' parents, and four students at SDN Rinjani Cirebon City in November-December 2024. The research instruments included structured interview guidelines and participatory observation. Data analysis uses the Miles and Huberman model through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawn. The validity of the data is guaranteed through source triangulation and member checking. The findings of the study showed that overstimulation of gadgets had a significant impact on students' academic abilities, which was characterized by decreased concentration, interest in reading, and learning achievement. Impacts on daily habits include disruption of sleep patterns and reduced physical activity. Social-emotionally, there is a decrease in socialization ability and the emergence of antisocial attitudes. The strategies implemented by teachers include the application of various learning methods based on student-centered, ice breaking, project-based learning, and collaboration with parents. This study concludes that the role of teachers is crucial in overcoming technological learning loss through pedagogical innovation and multi-stakeholder cooperation. The limitations of the study lie in the scope of one school with a limited sample. Follow-up research is recommended to examine the effectiveness of long-term interventions and involve a broader sample and develop a school-based integrated intervention model.

 

References

Agustina, R. N., Martinez, L. B., & Santos, E. D. (2024). Electronic gadget usage among kindergarten pupils at Lanas Elementary School: Parental perceptions and teacher-observed attention and focus. Journal of Learning and Development Studies, 4(2), 156–172.

Ahmad, N. (2024). Pandemic learning loss recovery strategy in the new normal period. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(1), 45–52.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.

Bergmann, C., Dimitrova, N., Alaslani, K., Almohammadi, A., Alroqi, H., Aussems, S., (2022). Young children’s screen time during the first COVID-19 lockdown in 12 countries. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05840-5

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Carr, N. (2020). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton & Company.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2021). Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(17), Article e2022376118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022376118

Gartstein, M. A., Crawford, J., & Robertson, C. D. (2008). Early markers of language and attention: Mutual contributions and the impact of parent–infant interactions. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 39(1), 9–26.

Hargreaves, A. (2021). What the COVID-19 pandemic has taught us about teachers and teaching. FACETS, 6, 1835–1863. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2021-0091

Kirkorian, H. L., Pempek, T. A., Murphy, L. A., Schmidt, M. E., & Anderson, D. R. (2009). The impact of background television on parent–child interaction. Child Development, 80(5), 1350–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01337.x

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lakilaki, E., Puri, R. M., Saputra, A. N. Z., Shawmi, A. N., Asiah, N., & Rizky, M. (2025). The phenomenological analysis of the impact of digital overstimulation on attention control in elementary school students: A study on the “brain rot” phenomenon in the learning process. TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal, 4(1), 265–274.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244(4907), 933–938. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2658056

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Muppalla, S. K., Vuppalapati, S., Reddy Pulliahgaru, A., & Sreenivasulu, H. (2023). Effects of excessive screen time on child development: An updated review and strategies for management. Cureus, 15(6), Article e40608. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40608

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.

Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481

Prensky, M. (2009). H. sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(3), Article 1.

Rachman, A. S., Aniq, M. K. H. B., & Setianingsih, E. S. (2021). An analysis of the use of gadget on students’ learning outcome (case study). International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(4), 558–565.

Radesky, J. S., Kistin, C. J., Zuckerman, B., Nitzberg, K., Gross, J., Kaplan-Sanoff, M., Augustyn, M., & Silverstein, M. (2014). Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants. Pediatrics, 133(4), e843–e849. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3703

Santos, R. M. S., Mendes, C. G., Miranda, D. M., & Romano-Silva, M. A. (2022). The association between screen time and attention in children: A systematic review. Developmental Neuropsychology, 47(4), 175–192.

Sappaile, B. I., Yusuf, N. F. M., Mardiati, M., Zoraida, M. N. C., & Sitepu, E. (2024). The impact of dependence on gadgets on student concentration and academic performance. Journal Emerging Technologies in Education, 2(2), 177–189.

Sari Rezeky, D., & Janiarti Zendrato, R. (2023). The impact of gadget use on motor and intellectual development in elementary school children. International Journal of Students Education, 1(2), 178–183.

Spruijt, A. M., Dekker, M. C., Ziermans, T. B., & Swaab, H. (2020). Attentional control and executive functioning in school-aged children: Linking self-regulation and parenting strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 193, Article 104791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104791

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2016). Metode penelitian pendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Vedechkina, M., & Borgonovi, F. (2021). A review of evidence on the role of digital technology in shaping attention and cognitive control in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 611155. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611155

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Al Ghozali, M. I., Prayitno, A. ., Sari, M. ., Nurfauziah, N. ., Rokhimah, R. ., & Asih, C. D. . (2026). The Role of Teachers in Overcoming Technology Learning Loss: The Impact of Gadget Overstimulation on Elementary School Students. Global Journal of Basic Education, 2(1), 80-96. https://doi.org/10.61227/y9vn9y31

Similar Articles

21-27 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.