Network Learning vs. E-Learning: EFL Teachers and Learners' Views

Mohammad Yarianfar

doi:10.61227/iltt.v1i2.221

Authors

Mohammad Yarianfar University of Tehran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61227/iltt.v1i2.221

Keywords:

Collaboration, E-Learning, Online learning, Learner-centered approach, Network Learning

Abstract

Recent years, the reputation and approval of online classes have paved the way to growing number of online course presented by institutions and colleges. The study aims at investigating the views of teachers and students about Network Learning vs. E-Learning and compare them. The analysis was carried out using the data collected through two separate structured questionnaires in a Likert scale for students and teachers at a university. Data were recorded in SPSS and analysed by using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results were presented in the forms of means and standard deviations. The finding showed the both teachers and students gave positive views about online classes in the forms of e-learning and network learning yet with a different percent. The study reveals that students are comfortable with online classes and are getting enough support from teachers but they do not believe that online classes will replace traditional classroom teaching. However, some teachers are facing problems in doing online classes due to a lack of proper training and development for doing online classes. There were some technical issues as a major problem for the effectiveness of these kinds of classes. Finally, Mann-Whitney U test is applied to explore any significant difference between the views of the two groups. It showed that both teachers and students views’ are more positive towards network learning. The study has some pedagogical implications and has some suggestions for further studies.

References

Agustina, E., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2017). Perceptions of Indonesian teachers and students on the use of Quipper School as an online platform for extended EFL learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(4), 738–746. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0804.20

Anderson, A. R., Christenson, S. L., Sinclair, M. F., & Lehr, C. A. (2004). Check & Connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school. Journal of School Psychology, 42(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.01.002

Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1281–1289. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0319

Beatty, B., & Ulasewicz, C. (2006). Faculty perspectives on moving from Blackboard to the Moodle learning management system. TechTrends, 50(4), 36–45.

Beaty, L., Hodgson, V., Mann, S., & McConnell, D. (2002). Towards e-quality in networked e-learning in higher education. Networked Learning Conference 2002. http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2002/manifesto.htm

Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2004). Becoming an online teacher: Adapting to a changed environment for teaching and learning in higher education. Educational Media International, 41(3), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980410001680842

Biesta, G. (2007). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701640227

Britt, R. (2006). Online education: A survey of faculty and students. Radiologic Technology, 77(3), 183–190.

Broekkamp, H., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2007). The gap between educational research and practice: A literature review, symposium, and questionnaire. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701626127

Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2018). Framing learning entanglement in innovative learning spaces: Connecting theory, design and practice. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 1120–1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3483

Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., & de Gispert, I. (2014). Supporting online collaborative learning in small groups: Teacher feedback on learning content, academic task and social participation. Computers & Education, 75, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.015

Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. Cassell.

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Elsevier.

Dohn, N. B. (2009). Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9066-8

The Economic Times. (2020). Definition of ‘e-learning’. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/e-learning

Fawns, T. (2019). Postdigital education in design and practice. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0021-8

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Goodyear, P. (2014). Productive learning networks: The evolution of research and practice. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks (pp. 23–47). Routledge.

Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in research on networked learning. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Hammond, M. (2017). Online collaboration and cooperation: The recurring importance of evidence, rationale and viability. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 1005–1024.

Harari, Y. N. (2020, March 20). The world after coronavirus. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/19d90308-6858-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75

Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2019). Networked learning and postdigital education. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0029-0

Hurd, S. (2005). Autonomy and the distance language learner. In B. Holmberg, M. Shelley, & C. White (Eds.), Distance education and languages (pp. 1–19). Multilingual Matters.

Inayat, I., Amin, R. U., Inayat, Z., & Salim, S. S. (2013). Effects of collaborative web based vocational education and training (VET) on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 68, 153–166.

Jones, C. R. (2015). Networked learning: An educational paradigm for the age of digital networks. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01934-5

Jones, C. R., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2009). Analysing networked learning practices: An introduction. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, C. R. Jones, & B. Lindström (Eds.), Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional development (pp. 1–27). Sense Publishers.

Ketelaar, E., Beijaard, D., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Den Brok, P. J. (2012). Teachers’ positioning towards an educational innovation in the light of ownership, sense-making and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.004

Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner–learner interaction. System, 37(2), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.02.003

King, F., & Stevenson, H. (2017). Generating change from below: What role for leadership from above? Journal of Educational Administration, 55(6), 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2016-0074

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., & Peruski, L. (2004). With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25–55.

Lewin, T. (2013, June 20). Online classes fuel campus debate. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/20/education/online-classes-fuel-a-campus-debate.html

Li, Q., & Akins, M. (2005). Sixteen myths about online teaching and learning in higher education: Don’t believe everything you hear. TechTrends, 49(4), 51–60.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.

Magen-Nagar, N., & Shonfeld, M. (2018). The impact of an online collaborative learning program on students’ attitude towards technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 621–637.

Margaliot, A., Gorev, D., & Vaisman, T. (2018). How student teachers describe the online collaborative learning experience and evaluate its contribution to their learning and their future work as teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(2), 88–102.

Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369

McConnell, D., Hodgson, V., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2012). Networked learning: A brief history and new trends. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning (pp. 3–24). Springer.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.

Nagy, A. (2005). The impact of e-learning. In P. A. Bruck, A. Buchholz, Z. Karssen, & A. Zerfass (Eds.), E-content: Technologies and perspectives for the European market (pp. 79–96). Springer-Verlag.

Ornellas, A., & Muñoz Carril, P. C. (2014). A methodological approach to support collaborative media creation in an e-learning higher education context. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(1), 59–71.

Ponti, M., & Hodgson, V. (2006). Networked management learning for managers of small and medium enterprises. In S. Banks, V. Hodgson, C. R. Jones, B. Kemp, D. McConnell, & C. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Networked Learning 2006. Lancaster University.

Poulou, M. (2005). The prevention of emotional and behavioural difficulties in schools: Teachers’ suggestions. Educational Psychology in Practice, 21(1), 39–54.

Ravet, J. (2007). Making sense of disengagement in the primary classroom: A study of pupil, teacher and parent perceptions. Research Papers in Education, 22(3), 333–362.

Rose-Krasnor, L. (1997). The nature of social competence: A theoretical review. Social Development, 6(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1997.tb00097.x

Ryberg, T., Davidsen, J., & Hodgson, V. (2018). Understanding nomadic collaborative learning groups. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12584

Scott, P. (2013, August 5). MOOCs: If we’re not careful, ‘open’ courses will change minds. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/aug/05/moocs-online-higher-education

Smith, B. (2005). The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588451

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.

Swan, K., Shen, J., & Hiltz, S. R. (2013). Assessment and collaboration in online learning. www.kent.edu/ehhs/dl/upload/assessment-and-collaborati

Tittasiri, W. (2003). A comparison of e-learning and traditional learning: Experimental approach. International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science, 12(3), 67–74.

Van der Heijden, H., Beijaard, D., Geldens, J. J., & Popeijus, M. (2018). Understanding teachers as change agents: An investigation of primary school teachers’ self-perception. Journal of Educational Change, 19, 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9320-9

Van Houtte, M. (2007). Exploring teacher trust in technical/vocational secondary schools: Male teachers’ preference for girls. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 826–839.

van Leeuwen, T. (2018). Aesthetics and text in the digital age. In K. A. Mills, A. Stornaiuolo, A. Smith, & J. Z. Pandya (Eds.), Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures (pp. 285–300). Routledge.

Whitty, G. (2006). Education(al) research and education policy making: Is conflict inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 159–176.

Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1–2), 6–24.

Zhang, K., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2001). Peer online discourse analysis. ERIC. https://search.proquest.com/eric/docview/62195116/4DE2C0795A2C4EBBPQ/