EFL Learners' Perception of Text Difficulty: What Lies Beyond Traditional Text Readability Formulas?

Fatemeh Rezaei

doi:10.61227/jetti.v2i2.142

Authors

Fatemeh Rezaei Mazandaran University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61227/jetti.v2i2.142

Keywords:

L2 reading, Readability, Text difficulty, Learners’ Perceptions

Abstract

The present study, adopting a mixed methods design, is in line with these recent studies which examines the relationship between text difficulty level and reading comprehension of a group of 112 pre-intermediate EFL learners. Moreover, in addition to two reading tests with less and more difficult passages, a semi-structured interview with 11 volunteer learners were devised to probe the perceptions of the learners about the elements contributing to text difficulty in reading comprehension tests. The results of the quantitative analysis indicated that there was a significant direct strong correlation between the test scores of the two reading tests with less and more difficult passages. In addition, the difference between the observed means of the two tests was significant. This implied that although the learners approached both tests in a similar manner, text difficulty could play a significant role in their achievement in reading test. The results of qualitative analysis also indicated that the role of background knowledge and vocabulary knowledge of the learners, as perceived by the participants of the study, have to be taken into account. Moreover, the text features such as the existence of cohesive devices and other inferential cues are of significance. The results confirm the significance of readability formula as a considerable means of measuring reading difficulty for EFL learners, and introduces the key roles of learners’ background knowledge and vocabulary knowledge as sources of perceived difficulty among learners. This is specifically important when determining the texts for different learners various ages and educational levels. An important implication of this study is that teaching and reading assessment need to consider factors such as students' vocabulary knowledge, knowledge background, coherence of the text, as well as the interaction between reader characteristics and text features. It is recommended that English as a foreign language (EFL) educators develop a more holistic approach to selecting and using reading texts taking into account not only traditional readability formulas, but also other important factors such as students' vocabulary knowledge, knowledge background, and level of text coherence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amendum, S. J., Conradi, K., & Hiebert, E. (2018). Does text complexity matter in the elementary grades? A research synthesis of text difficulty and elementary students’ reading fluency and comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 121-151.

Andreani, S., Muniroh, S., Suharyadi, S., Astuti, U. P., & Yulizar, Y. (2021). The contribution of genre awareness and reading habits towards students' reading comprehension. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 463-476.

Anne E. Mesmer, H., Hiebert, E. H., Cunningham, J. W., & Kapania, M. (2020). Does one size fit all? Exploring the contribution of text features, text content, and grade of use on comprehension. Reading Psychology, 42(1), 42-72.

Arthur, J. (2016). Convergence on policy goals: Character education in East Asia and England. Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 59–71.

Ayu, M. (2021). Applying Text Feature Walks Strategy in Higher Education to Improve Students' Reading Comprehension. Journal of English Teaching, 7(3), 354-365.

Crossley, S. A., Greenfield, J., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Assessing text readability using cognitively based indices. Tesol Quarterly, 42(3), 475-493.

Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis. Behavior research methods, 49(3), 803-821.

Day, R. R., & Park, J. S. (2005). Developing Reading Comprehension Questions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 60-73.

De Clercq, O., Hoste, V., Desmet, B., Van Oosten, P., De Cock, M., &Macken, L. (2014). Using the crowd for readability prediction. Nat. Lang. Eng., 20(3), 293-325.

Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3-11.

Follmer, D. J., & Sperling, R. A. (2018). Interactions between reader and text: Contributions of cognitive processes, strategy use, and text cohesion to comprehension of expository science text. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 177-187.

Francis, D. J., Kulesz, P. A., & Benoit, J. S. (2018). Extending the simple view of reading to account for variation within readers and across texts: The complete view of reading (CVR i). Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 274-288.

Golke, S., Steininger, T., & Wittwer, J. (2022). What makes learners overestimate their text comprehension? The impact of learner characteristics on judgment bias. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2405-2450.

Hashemi, M. R. (2014). Understanding Research in Applied Linguistics: SAMAT.

Hiebert, E. H. (2011). Beyond single readability measures: Using multiple sources of information in establishing text complexity. Journal of Education, 191(2), 33-42.

James, E., Currie, N. K., Tong, S. X., & Cain, K. (2021). The relations between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in beginner readers to young adolescents. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 110-130.

Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological review, 95(2), 163.

Magliano, J. P., Millis, K., Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). A multidimensional framework to evaluate reading assessment tools. Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies, 107-136.

McNamara, D. S., &Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse processes, 22(3), 247-288.

Pickren, S. E., Stacy, M., Del Tufo, S. N., Spencer, M., & Cutting, L. E. (2022). The contribution of text characteristics to reading comprehension: Investigating the influence of text emotionality. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 649-667.

Schmitz, A., Gräsel, C., & Rothstein, B. (2017). Students’ genre expectations and the effects of text cohesion on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 30, 1115-1135.

Shorkaee, H. Z., & Talebi, S. H. (2018). Effects of reading strategy instruction on attitude toward strategies and performance in reading texts of different difficulty levels. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 18(1), 64-81.

Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214-240.

Strohmaier, A. R., Ehmke, T., Härtig, H., & Leiss, D. (2023). On the role of linguistic features for comprehension and learning from STEM texts. A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 39, 100533.

Sullivan, S. D., Grant, C. E., & Patel, S. (2023). Early Intervention for Kindergarten-Aged Students: Providing an Academic Advantage to Promote Reading Growth. Educational Research Quarterly, 46(3).

Van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2017). Development of reading comprehension. Theories of Reading Development, 15, 283-306.

Van den Broek, P., Virtue, S., Everson, M. G., Tzeng, Y., & Sung, Y. C. (2014). Comprehension and memory of science texts: Inferential processes and the construction of a mental representation. In The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 131-154). Routledge.

Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2-40.

Yildiz, M., & Çetinkaya, E. (2017). The Relationship between Good Readers' Attention, Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 366-371.

Zano, K. (2022). Breadth and Depth-vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension in an English first additional language context. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(2), 223-233.